Atlantic Bluefin Tuna -
Severity of Decline and its Causes
Many consider bluefin the greatest of big game fish.
However, it's also in the greatest danger of extinction
because of the price on its head.
Here are the facts.
|What's it Like to Fight a Giant?
"It's like hooking up to a car doing 50 miles an hour. Marlin and sailfish are spectacular. But they wear themselves out with all their jumps. Giant bluefin have more power and stamina than anything else."
|Left, one of many "granders" caught by Jack Cashman, among the best giant bluefin tuna fishermen - ever. This one weighed 1,150 lbs. Email him at CashmanNJ@aol.com.|
|The Thrill of Catching
a Giant Bluefin Tuna
It's described by Jim Chambers in his feature article entitled "Hunting Giants". It appears in the August 2000 issue of Sport Fishing Magazine, shown at right. That's Chambers (left) and the crew of the Tuna Hunter on the magazine's cover straining to bring a 900-pound giant aboard.
To read the full article, CLICK HERE.
But, this Premiere Gamefish
|Its Population Has Crashed|
Above - abundance of spawning size bluefin (620 lbs. and larger) was last at the long-term sustainable population level (MSY) in the mid-1970s. It has declined much more dangerously since. Conveniently, ICCAT policymakers recently "redefined" MSY at half the level shown above - a clever, but bogus way to avoid having to reduce catches as needed to rebuild the stock. This was described as "moving the goalposts to the 50 yard line." Incredibly, the U.S. government's representatives to ICCAT agreed to this bogus approach - but without even consulting their own scientists on its validity.
Below - using the "new" definition, the 2006 stock assessment estimated that by the end of 2004, the population of western-spawned adult bluefin -"our" bluefin - had been driven to 18% of its new MSY level. Regardless of how MSY is defined, the fact is that compared to its abundance before longlines were introduced (i.e., 1960), the population is now just 3% of its former level - a 97% decline. Recent research has found, however, that perhaps half of the bluefin we thought were "ours" are really bluefin spawned in the Mediterranean which had migrated for feeding off the U.S. coast. So, we really may have left only 1.5% of the western stock of bluefin that existed in 1960 when the population began its steep decline caused by overfishing. Ominously, it is still slowly declining toward extinction, as can be seen below.
Lawsuit Filed to Protect Spawning Areas - On November 1, 2006, Earthjustice filed a lawsuit challenging the failure of NMFS to limit longline fishing (through the use of closures) in the Gulf of Mexico during their spawning season which is contributing to the decimation of adult bluefin tuna. Press release available here.
Endangered Species Act Protection Sought - Because of the dire situation described at left, in May 2010, the Center for Biological Diversity filed a formal petition with the Secretary of Commerce to have North Atlantic Bluefin Tuna declared a "threatened" or an "endangered" species and protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Click here for the CBD Press Release and here for the petition.
The Deepwater Horizon disaster could not have come at a worse time for bluefin survival. The western North Atlantic bluefin population - "our" bluefin - spawn each year in the north-central Gulf of Mexico during May - this year beginning just after the blowout started. Its eggs and larvae were carried by the "Loop Current" directly into the oil. Any eggs or larvae coming in contact with oil will die. The oils' effects on young bluefin have been magnified by the use of dispersants which are also toxic and which dissolve the toxic oil and can spread it top to bottom throughout the water column.
Chambers and Associates believes the U.S. government should establish closures to all lethal fishing in the bluefin's concentration
areas, particularly its spawning area in the north central Gulf of Mexico, its nursery
grounds off the mid-Atlantic states and its summer through fall feeding grounds
in the Gulf of Maine/Cape Cod area - particularly Stellwagen Bank and
Jeffrey's Ledge. International cooperation with
Canada will be needed to protect adult bluefin feeding grounds off Nova Scotia
and Prince Edward Island.
Excessive fishing pressure on the bluefin's primary prey species
(particularly herring and menhaden) in its main U.S. feeding grounds should
also be eliminated.
One North Atlantic Stock or Two? - According to the world's scientific community (as represented by ICCAT's scientific advisory committee), the western and eastern North Atlantic bluefin tuna stocks are two separate and distinct populations that do not interbreed. Their spawning areas are thousands of miles apart (see Bluefin Spawning Areas). The western stock spawns in the north-central Gulf of Mexico, from May 1 through June 7, and ranges during the summer through fall along the east coast of North America as far north as Labrador and out into the North Atlantic following the Gulf Stream. And the lack of prey (herring, whiting, menhaden, etc.) due to overfishing in nearshore shelf waters off New England has likely driven them increasingly north off Nova Scotia or farther offshore toward the mid-Atlantic. The eastern stock spawns in the Mediterranean Sea, primarily in June, and ranges during the summer through fall in the Atlantic from the Canary Islands to south of Iceland. There are also great differences in the size at which the two stocks mature. The western stock reaches maturity on average at about 620 lbs. (12 years old) - roughly six times the size at which the eastern stock matures (i.e., between 85 and 135 lbs. and 4 to 5 years of age). There is substantial intermixing of the adults of the two stocks during the summer-fall feeding period particularly along the Gulf Stream in the central North Atlantic and to a lesser extent off the U.S. east coast. However, by late spring the adults of the two stocks return to their respective spawning areas, just as do salmon. Recent archival and pop-off tagging programs are now available that clarify these large-scale migrations, spawning site fidelity of the two stocks, size of maturity and even daily feeding movements to depths of a half mile for an hour or more. Recent scientific findings are reported in Nature, Vol. 434, p. 1121, April 28, 2005.
|The Number of Young Has Also Declined Fewer Juveniles Each Year|
|There are only a few relatively decent year classes left - such as the '94-'95 and '97-'98 year classes, which by Jan. 2004, should have weighed about 350 and 155 lbs. They are vitally important to the future of this population and must be protected, at least through their first spawning season (around May 2009 for the '97-'98 year class). Throughout the 1960s, vast numbers of juveniles were taken (to be canned as cat food) by purse seiners operating in the bluefin's nursery areas along the U.S. mid-Atlantic coast. And until the mid1970s, Japanese longliners decimated the adults on their spawning grounds in the Gulf of Mexico. The western North Atlantic bluefin stock has still not begun to recover from this terrible "double whammy." What makes this story all the more depressing is that the purse seining was encouraged and promoted by NMFS - the federal agency charged with the responsibility for conserving and protecting the nation's marine fishery resources. This debacle was later repeated by NMFS in the early 1980s with equally disastrous results in the case of Atlantic sharks.|
Severity of Atlantic Population Declines
Endangered Species Act
World Records and Other Large Game Fish
|Chambers and Associates
9814 Kensington Parkway
Kensington, Maryland 20895
(T) (301) 949-7778 (Fax) (301) 949-3003
Longliners fish most heavily during the periods when the moon is brightest. So,
this real-time image of the moon phase shows when the kill of swordfish is
greatest and least. It also shows when the kill of blue marlin, white marlin,
sailfish, sharks, tunas, sea turtles, marine mammals and a host of other marine
life is also greatest - even though they are not even targeted. For more,