Severity of Decline and its Causes
|Swordfish are distributed worldwide. The
North Atlantic population is considered one interbreeding unit that is "managed" as a single "stock." If they live long enough (perhaps 25 years), they can reach 2,200 lbs. Like other billfish, all the large individuals are females since male swordfish rarely exceed 200 lbs.
The first recorded sale of Atlantic swordfish was in 1817. The average size landed commercially has declined from 400-500 lbs. in 1861 (newspaper story), 300-400 lbs. by the turn of the 20th century, over 266 lbs. in 1961 (when longlining largely replaced harpoon, hand-line and rod and reel as the primary commercial gear used) to 88 lbs. today. The international longline fleets target swordfish and tunas because they are the most valuable commercially.
Most swordfish - almost two of every three - are now caught before they have a chance to spawn. On average, females do not mature until age 5 and about 150 lbs. and males mature at 3 years and 72 lbs. Of the females caught commercially, 83% are still immature. ICCAT's minimum size limit is now 41 lbs. (= 33 lbs. dressed weight), and U.S. longliners routinely "discard" 40-50% of the swordfish they catch because they are too small to sell legally. Due to the trauma involved in longline retrieval (e.g., jaws and gills torn apart) virtually all of these fish (age 1 or 2) are either dead already or die soon thereafter. In 1998, the U.S. fleet "discarded" 433 metric tons of such baby swordfish. Just imagine how many baby swordfish it takes to make a ton.
This is the result of many (smaller) vessels fishing in the swordfish's primary nursery areas, particularly those surrounding Florida (and in the fall, off Charleston, SC). See links at the bottom of this page for maps showing the locations of the spawning and nursery areas of this population. The largest U.S. vessels (the "distant water fleet") have had to travel farther each year to find sufficient swordfish. They now target them in their primary spawning areas between the Caribbean Islands and two large areas well east and south of the Virgin Islands in the Atlantic (the sites of major surface currents as shown below) during the early spring, then pursue the adults to their primary feeding areas on the Grand Banks until late fall. At the bottom of this page you can find links to the maps showing where longline effort and catch is concentrated.
After depleting the North Atlantic population, the international longline fleets moved to the South Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean. However, after only a few years fishing out of Hawaii, most U.S. vessels left the Pacific and are concentrating on the South Atlantic population (see below) some as U.S. flag vessels and many re-flagged to avoid having to abide by U.S. regulations. From the evidence we have, it is reasonable to conclude that all swordfish populations are in serious trouble, as noted below for the Atlantic.
|30 Years of Decline|
|For a long time, the North Atlantic swordfish stock has been declining more rapidly than any other marine species. It has been steadily doing so at the same rate each year for the past 20 years! Destruction of this population has been meticulously documented each year for ICCAT by its scientific advisory committee. Yet ICCAT has failed to limit the catch of its 48 member states sufficiently in order to produce its stated management objective - the maximum sustainable yield or MSY (represented by the horizontal line at 1.0 on the figures below). Responsible fishery managers would never allow the population to fall below the MSY level.|
|As depicted in ICCAT's figure at left (top), by the end of 1998,
North Atlantic swordfish abundance (or biomass) had been driven down to only 65 percent of that needed to produce the MSY. An unfished or "virgin" population level would be a biomass of 2 times MSY level. This stock was last at
such a healthy level in 1978. It has declined steadily and dramatically every year since. The fishing pressure exerted on this population, and the cause of the decline in abundance, is portrayed in the lower figure to the left. Fishing pressure should never be allowed to exceed the level that would produce MSY (represented by the horizontal line at 1.0). Unfortunately, fishing pressure at the end of 1995 was more than double the rate that the stock can sustain (MSY). Consequently, the stock
has continued to decline.
The 1999 stock assessment used catch data through 1998. It showed that the small quota reductions first imposed by ICCAT in 1997 may have slowed the decline. But, they were too little to cause the population to begin to rebuild. Fishing pressure (at 1.38) was still well above the MSY level and thus still too high. The population was close to 50% of the MSY level - considered the threshold for recruitment failure. Beyond that point the population has too few adults to sustain itself and, unless fishing pressure is reduced, it will continue to spiral downward. Eventually a point will be reached at which there are too few adults remaining to find each other for spawning. At that point, the population will decline to extinction even if all fishing were to be stopped.
"Fully Recovered" or Not?
A new stock assessment was conducted in 2002 using catch data through 2001. It depicts a dramatic increase in North Atlantic swordfish biomass even as both catch and catch per unit effort continued to decline. We believe this apparent abundance increase is not real, but contrived. The year after the 1999 stock assessment meeting at which Japan threatened to submit "different numbers in the future" they did so, submitting vastly different catch data (see Fig 1 near the bottom of page 60 in ICCAT's latest stock assessment) showing huge discards of very small swordfish in 2000 through 2003 (about 600 metric tons per year and twice that of the U.S. and Canada's, combined), which they knew would cause the stock assessment model to wrongly assume there had been an enormous increase in young fish reproduction and survival and thus a larger population building. (Japan, like any ICCAT member country, can submit any information it wants because there are no independent observers.) During these same 4 years, Japan also reported landing zero legal-size swordfish after previously reporting many years of landings averaging about 1300 tons per year. This would also dramatically skew the model's results. Why?
We suspect that the Japanese believed that if ICCAT's estimates of swordfish (or bluefin tuna) biomass continued to decline (as depicted above left and on our Bluefin page) it might be forced to limit its catches thus affecting Japan's extensive fleets targeting tuna and swordfish. In this context, it is important to recognize that Japan was recently exposed by the Australian government for having lied for many years about the tonnage of Southern Bluefin Tuna - a severely overfished stock subject to intense conservation efforts - they had been catching off Australia. Apparently, none of the Japanese catch data for tuna or swordfish can now be trusted, nor can stock assessments based on their data. Accordingly, we consider the abundance estimates from all ICCAT's swordfish stock assessments since 2000 to be bogus. With no change in total annual landings, the stock of North Atlantic swordfish could not miraculously recover from "severely overfished" - the status portrayed in the figures above - in just two years as ICCAT would have us believe. This "full recovery" has been manufactured by the submission to the stock assessment committee of intentionally misleading catch information, apparently just as the Japanese did for the Southern Bluefin Tuna stock assessments. However, it is curious that none of the scientists on this ICCAT committee (see pages 121 and 122 of ICCAT's detailed report) have "blown the whistle" and exposed this obvious charade that began in 2001 and continues today.
The population decline between 1990 and 2007 in both the North Atlantic and the South Atlantic (2 separate stocks) is even evident in ICCAT's figures from its most recent stock assessment, below. First the North Atlantic stock has been severely reduced and now, apparently, so has the South Atlantic. (As we show on our Bluefin page, the South Atlantic bluefin tuna stock, which most observers didn't even realize existed, was actually extirpated in just 10 years - 1960 to 1970.) The "Give Swordfish a Break" boycott campaign should be renewed while some swordfish still exist, and a new campaign begun to stop all lethal fishing on the much more severely depleted Western North Atlantic Bluefin - "our" bluefin tuna for which an "endangered species" listing has already been sought.
Capable of Rapid Recovery
Like bluefin tuna, swordfish are prolific egg producers - a large female can produce 30 million eggs each year. The important point and the good news is that swordfish are capable of rapid recovery, if only given the chance.
|South Atlantic Swordfish|
North Atlantic swordfish population has been decimated by overfishing, U.S. and international longline and other commercial vessels have concentrated increasingly on the
South Atlantic population, with predictable results
(see ICCAT's maps above). The high and increasing pressure has produced a decline
in abundance that is as rapid as that experienced by the North Atlantic stock. It is simply about 7 years behind the
North Atlantic stock's demise, as depicted in the figure
at left (above) taken from ICCAT's stock assessment using catch data through
The cause, again, is unrestrained fishing pressure (rapidly exceeding the MSY level
by the end of 1995) that has been allowed by ICCAT, as depicted in the lower figure.
ICCAT says it is trying to keep all populations at their MSY level (1.0 on
the abundance figure - B/Bmsy - at left). Yet Atlantic swordfish abundance has
been allowed to decline by 85% since longlining began in 1960 and it is
still declining. Responsible fishery managers would never let a stock
decline below the MSY level (1.0 on the figure at left), yet ICCAT has let
this South Atlantic stock decline to about 40% of its MSY abundance. Excessive
fishing mortality, the cause of the abundance decline, was in 2002 over 2 times
the maximum (MSY) level, and ever since 1987, has been rising steeply (lower
"Deephunter" by Al Barnes
|OTHER PAGES ON THIS WEBSITE
Severity of Atlantic Population Declines
The Facts - Headed for Extinction
Endangered Species Act
White Marlin Listing Petition
Maps - White Marlin Critical Habitat
Maps of Atlantic Spawning and Feeding Areas
Swordfish, Bluefin, White Marlin, Blue Marlin, Sailfish
Blue Marlin "Hot Spots"
North Atlantic Current Patterns
Congress' Longline Closure Bills
Will They Work?
|Photos (Many World Records)
Swordfish - 3 pages
Atlantic Blue Marlin - 3 pages
Pacific Blue Marlin - 3 pages
Black Marlin - 3 pages
Bluefin Tuna - 6 pages
Articles on Big Game Fish and Fishing
|Chambers and Associates
9814 Kensington Parkway
Kensington, Maryland 20895
(T) (301) 949-7778 (Fax) (301) 949-3003
This website has hosted over
2.5 million visitors
and gets 1,500 page visits per day
Longliners fish most heavily during the periods when the moon is brightest. So, this real-time image of the moon phase shows when the kill of swordfish is greatest and least. It also shows when the kill of blue marlin, white marlin, sailfish, sharks, tunas, sea turtles, marine mammals and a host of other marine life is also greatest - even though they are not even targeted. For more, see link above.